<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Free NFPA Codes and Standards</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inspector911.com/free-nfpa-codes-and-standards/411/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inspector911.com/free-nfpa-codes-and-standards/411</link>
	<description>Resources, Checklists, and Training for inspectors with NFPA and the ICC codes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 14:46:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael O&#039;Brian</title>
		<link>http://inspector911.com/free-nfpa-codes-and-standards/411/comment-page-1#comment-969</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael O&#039;Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Dec 2010 03:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspector911.com/?p=411#comment-969</guid>
		<description>Ian, the Standard is NFPA 72 and the wiring section varies on the classes....Class A has a loop back on the circuit and does not use end of line resistors.  The system has some redundancy built into it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ian, the Standard is NFPA 72 and the wiring section varies on the classes&#8230;.Class A has a loop back on the circuit and does not use end of line resistors.  The system has some redundancy built into it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ian Andrews</title>
		<link>http://inspector911.com/free-nfpa-codes-and-standards/411/comment-page-1#comment-966</link>
		<dc:creator>Ian Andrews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 13:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspector911.com/?p=411#comment-966</guid>
		<description>What are the characteristics of a class A fire alarm circuit and where can I find additional information on this type of fire alarm system. 

I am very much interested in understanding these fire alarm systems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What are the characteristics of a class A fire alarm circuit and where can I find additional information on this type of fire alarm system. </p>
<p>I am very much interested in understanding these fire alarm systems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael O'Brian</title>
		<link>http://inspector911.com/free-nfpa-codes-and-standards/411/comment-page-1#comment-475</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael O'Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 20:27:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspector911.com/?p=411#comment-475</guid>
		<description>Glenn, thanks for your comments on getting on our mailing list, go to http://inspector911.com/inspectors-report fill out the form on the page.  We will send you an email to confirm that you are a real person, let me know if you have any problems</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Glenn, thanks for your comments on getting on our mailing list, go to <a href="http://inspector911.com/inspectors-report" rel="nofollow">http://inspector911.com/inspectors-report</a> fill out the form on the page.  We will send you an email to confirm that you are a real person, let me know if you have any problems</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glenn Zurek</title>
		<link>http://inspector911.com/free-nfpa-codes-and-standards/411/comment-page-1#comment-474</link>
		<dc:creator>Glenn Zurek</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 02:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspector911.com/?p=411#comment-474</guid>
		<description>Interested in getting on your mailing list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interested in getting on your mailing list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Markowitz</title>
		<link>http://inspector911.com/free-nfpa-codes-and-standards/411/comment-page-1#comment-456</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Markowitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:08:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspector911.com/?p=411#comment-456</guid>
		<description>As a small  electrical / alarm integration contractor and professional fire investigator
along with side job of chief broadcast engineer for a 5000 watt am radio station my annual cost of buying code books is almost 1000.00 a year so i can at least try to stay current 
that&#039;s a lot for a small 1 man  company to absorb .
But if you want to stay on top of the game you need to be code knowledgeable that&#039;s why I often get jobs others do not. How many company in my area even have a complete set of code books they need to do there jobs, not many and that even includes the bigger outfits.
which is why most of my work is take over and cleaning up installs and making them code compliant. If the codes where more readily available with out the high cost I think more individuals would be buying them and using them but unless an employer buys them the employees will not buy or learn any thing. Which is why I have such a mess in my state despite fact we passed a uniform construction code almost 7 years ago.
Then of course even providing them low cost is not enough the codes need to be written where they are understandable by the worker not just the engineer
we have a neutral and hot wire  when we hook up the circuit  yet these common terms are not in the NEC70 instead there called grounded and ungrounded conductors 
we use Romex and BX wire but in code you find it under  Nonmetallic cable and Armored cable again when an electrician goes into NEC 70 and trys t find those 2 terms he can not and so the confusion begins.
and we stand around and gripe abut codes maybe more people would use them when they made sense and where affordable. thank you NFPA for now allowing this new way of doing it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a small  electrical / alarm integration contractor and professional fire investigator<br />
along with side job of chief broadcast engineer for a 5000 watt am radio station my annual cost of buying code books is almost 1000.00 a year so i can at least try to stay current<br />
that&#8217;s a lot for a small 1 man  company to absorb .<br />
But if you want to stay on top of the game you need to be code knowledgeable that&#8217;s why I often get jobs others do not. How many company in my area even have a complete set of code books they need to do there jobs, not many and that even includes the bigger outfits.<br />
which is why most of my work is take over and cleaning up installs and making them code compliant. If the codes where more readily available with out the high cost I think more individuals would be buying them and using them but unless an employer buys them the employees will not buy or learn any thing. Which is why I have such a mess in my state despite fact we passed a uniform construction code almost 7 years ago.<br />
Then of course even providing them low cost is not enough the codes need to be written where they are understandable by the worker not just the engineer<br />
we have a neutral and hot wire  when we hook up the circuit  yet these common terms are not in the NEC70 instead there called grounded and ungrounded conductors<br />
we use Romex and BX wire but in code you find it under  Nonmetallic cable and Armored cable again when an electrician goes into NEC 70 and trys t find those 2 terms he can not and so the confusion begins.<br />
and we stand around and gripe abut codes maybe more people would use them when they made sense and where affordable. thank you NFPA for now allowing this new way of doing it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

