<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does This Meet Code 3</title>
	<atom:link href="http://inspector911.com/does-this-meet-code-3/242/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://inspector911.com/does-this-meet-code-3/242</link>
	<description>Resources, Checklists, and Training for inspectors with NFPA and the ICC codes</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2012 22:31:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Rogers</title>
		<link>http://inspector911.com/does-this-meet-code-3/242/comment-page-1#comment-206</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Rogers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 15:57:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspector911.com/?p=242#comment-206</guid>
		<description>Seems to me, that ANY leak in a sprinkler system, especially the heads, should scream that something is wrong.  Whether it&#039;s the wrong anti-freeze or just a leak, the leak obviously proves the system needs to be examined to see that it meets the pressure-test standard.  While the system may meet code for design (I&#039;d have to see more of it,) it has an operational problem that needs to be addressed.  Let&#039;s face it, besides what the code requires, the selling point for a fire sprinkler system is that it&#039;s a silent, &quot;invisible&quot; watch system.  If it leaks, it&#039;s not &quot;invisible.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems to me, that ANY leak in a sprinkler system, especially the heads, should scream that something is wrong.  Whether it&#8217;s the wrong anti-freeze or just a leak, the leak obviously proves the system needs to be examined to see that it meets the pressure-test standard.  While the system may meet code for design (I&#8217;d have to see more of it,) it has an operational problem that needs to be addressed.  Let&#8217;s face it, besides what the code requires, the selling point for a fire sprinkler system is that it&#8217;s a silent, &#8220;invisible&#8221; watch system.  If it leaks, it&#8217;s not &#8220;invisible.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Insurance LC Rep</title>
		<link>http://inspector911.com/does-this-meet-code-3/242/comment-page-1#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Insurance LC Rep</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspector911.com/?p=242#comment-183</guid>
		<description>So do you think they have a RPZ where the sprinkler system connects to the public water supply?  I am sure the  expansion chamber is listed for sprinkler systems and calculations have been completed and it is the correct size for the quantity of antifreeze in the system. Another quality installation, got to love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So do you think they have a RPZ where the sprinkler system connects to the public water supply?  I am sure the  expansion chamber is listed for sprinkler systems and calculations have been completed and it is the correct size for the quantity of antifreeze in the system. Another quality installation, got to love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Wheeler</title>
		<link>http://inspector911.com/does-this-meet-code-3/242/comment-page-1#comment-179</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Wheeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 16:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspector911.com/?p=242#comment-179</guid>
		<description>CPVC piping is lsted for wet sprinkler systems only, has temperature limitations and cannot be used for ordinary hazard or extra hazard areas (NFPA 13.3-3.5)
The expansion chamber should be between the supply and the anti-freeze system to allow for thermal expasion of the anti-freeze. (NFPA 13.4-5.3.2). The expansion chamber in this system appears to be located between the riser and the drain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPVC piping is lsted for wet sprinkler systems only, has temperature limitations and cannot be used for ordinary hazard or extra hazard areas (NFPA 13.3-3.5)<br />
The expansion chamber should be between the supply and the anti-freeze system to allow for thermal expasion of the anti-freeze. (NFPA 13.4-5.3.2). The expansion chamber in this system appears to be located between the riser and the drain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Wheeler</title>
		<link>http://inspector911.com/does-this-meet-code-3/242/comment-page-1#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Wheeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 15:59:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspector911.com/?p=242#comment-178</guid>
		<description>CPVC piping has temperature limitations and is listed for only wet pipe systems and is not listed for ordinary hazard or extra ordinary haw=zard locations (NFPA 13.3-3.5). The expansion chamber is only connected to the drain and should be placed between the anti-freeze piping and the water supply to allow for thermal expansion of the anti-freeze (NFPA (13.4-5.3.2).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CPVC piping has temperature limitations and is listed for only wet pipe systems and is not listed for ordinary hazard or extra ordinary haw=zard locations (NFPA 13.3-3.5). The expansion chamber is only connected to the drain and should be placed between the anti-freeze piping and the water supply to allow for thermal expansion of the anti-freeze (NFPA (13.4-5.3.2).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://inspector911.com/does-this-meet-code-3/242/comment-page-1#comment-177</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 14:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://inspector911.com/?p=242#comment-177</guid>
		<description>Most likely the contractor used the wrong type of antifreeze solution.  CPVC only allows clean glycerine/water solution, no Glycols.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most likely the contractor used the wrong type of antifreeze solution.  CPVC only allows clean glycerine/water solution, no Glycols.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

